31 January 2009

FROST NIXON


Saya termenung sesaat, begitu credit title yang menayangkan daftar pihak-pihak di belakang layar pembuatan film Frost Nixon terlihat mengakhiri durasi film besutan Ron Howard ini.

Begitu ‘cantiknya’ permainan pikiran dalam film yang cukup diunggulkan dalam Golden Globe Awards 2009 kemarin ini. Saya bukan membicarakan kemampuan akting 2 aktor utama dalam film based on the true story ini, walaupun tidak dapat dipungkiri, baik Frank Langella yang memerankan Presiden ke-27 Amerika Serikat-Richard Nixon dan Michael Sheen sebagai presenter talkshow Inggris, David Frost, merupakan perpaduan sempurna.

Saya memang tertarik dengan segala hal yang berbau ketata negaraan dalam arti praktikal, diplomasi internasional, dan politik (termasuk skandal di dalamnya). Dan saya dengan semangat’45, menjadikan dvd baja*** film Frost Nixon ini sebagai tontonan ‘malam minggu’ di kamar =)
Tanpa saya sadari sebelumnya, keputusan saya untuk menonton film ini membawa saya pada sebuah pemikiran baru dengan cara pandang yang juga baru terhadap suatu fakta sejarah.

Siapa yang tidak mengenal Richard Nixon sebagai ‘kegagalan nahas dalam sejarah US Presidential History’? Terungkapnya rekaman suara berisi percakapan politik kotornya yang dikenal dengan skandal “Watergate” pada tahun 1971, membuat Nixon dilengserkan US House of Representative dari kursi kepresidenan yang baru 2 tahun dirasakannya. Seluruh Amerika mengutuknya, mengatainya dengan berbagai ungkapan amarah, dan meminta diadakan peradilan khusus terhadap kejahatan dan pengkhianatan yang dilakukan Nixon terhadap negara Amerika yang telah memilihnya.

Namun Wakil Presiden yang mendampingi Nixon, yang selanjutnya menggantikan kedudukannya sebagai Presiden Amerika, yakni Gerard Ford, memberikan maaf terhadapnya, dan meniadakan begitu saja persoalan atas skandal watergate yang tersohor itu. “Selamat lah” Richard Nixon kala itu.
Hal yang membuat kemarahan publik Amerika semakin besar adalah, fakta tidak adanya ungkapan atau pengakuan dari Richard Nixon atas kesalahan yang diperbuatnya tersebut.

Bahkan tidak pernah ada kata maaf dari mulut Nixon, hal yang mungkin saja dapat membuatnya ‘sedikit’ kembali diterima oleh warga Amerika saat itu. Keterdiaman Nixon membuat begitu banyak jurnalis Amerika berusaha untuk melakukan wawancara terhadapnya, dengan tujuan utama: mengoreknya secara langsung di hadapan kamera, menjatuhkan sang mantan presiden, dan membuatnya malu. Dapat dimaklumi tujuan itu menjadi tujuan utama para jurnalis saat itu, karena siapapun yang bisa melakukan hal itu, pasti akan mendapat keuntungan banyak. Mulai dari nama besar, dielu-elukan oleh Amerika, dan dianggap sebagai pahlawan.

Begitulah yang ada di pikiran presenter talkshow selebriti asal Inggris, David Frost, yang memiliki show di Inggris dan Australia. Ia berharap dapat ‘menaklukkan Amerika’ lewat wawancara impiannya dengan Nixon.

Ketika ia terpilih menjadi pewawancara satu-satunya Richard Nixon setelah tidak lagi menjadi Presiden Amerika Serikat, Frost dihantui dengan ketidakyakinan khalayak ramai perihal kemampuannya yang biasanya hanya mewawancarai artis dan kalangan entertainer semata, tiba-tiba malah mewawancarai mantan Presiden Amerika Serikat.
Tapi tanpa dinyana, Frost justru mampu mengukir sejarah menjadi satu-satunya pewawancara Nixon sepanjang karir politik sang mantan Presiden, yang dapat membawa Nixon pada mimik penuh sesal, sedih, kesendirian yang terlihat jelas, linglung, dan satu hal yang mengagetkan: Di akhir wawancara tersebut, Nixon mengakui kesalahannya, mengakui tamatnya riwayat karir politik yang dimilikinya, dan mengakui pengkhianatannya terhadap bangsa Amerika.

Wawancara inilah yang membawa David Frost pada kesuksesan dan kegemilangan karir sepanjang hidupnya. Ia dielu-elukan dunia pada saat itu, meraih apa yang selama ini dinantikannya: pengakuan atas eksistensinya sebagai seorang jurnalis, dan kehormatan.

Saya selalu mencoba mencari hal-hal positif yang dapat saya tiru dan pelajari dari sebuah film yang saya tonton. Baik itu film lokal atau asing, saya selalu mencoba mencari hal tersebut.
Dan saya menemukan begitu banyak hal dari film Frost Nixon ini.

Saya jadi menyadari betapa dekatnya dunia politik dengan kehancuran harga diri seseorang. Dunia ini mampu ‘mengangkat tinggi’ seseorang dari tidak ada menjadi ada.
Lewat dunia ini, uang dan kredibilitas seakan mampu mengikuti kemanapun sang politisi pergi, dengan catatan: ia adalah politisi mumpuni, bukan politisi karbitan yang cuma sesaat numpang nongol dan numpang lewat.

Saya juga melihat dengan jelas dalam film ini: Kesuksesan tidak datang dari langit, tapi datang dari perjuangan yang kita lakukan. David Frost yang selalu dipandang sebagai pembawa acara talkshow selebriti, berupaya keras menghargai kesempatan berharga yang ia dapatkan lewat mewawancarai Nixon.
Ia mempekerjakan 1 orang wartawan Amerika dan 1 orang penulis buku anti Richard Nixon, guna menemani dan membantunya melakukan riset terhadap Richard Nixon melalui kumpulan arsip dan rekaman-rekaman yang melibatkan sang mantan presiden semasa kepemimpinannya.

Ia mampu memanfaatkan kesempatan yang ada di hadapannya, menjadi sebuah tantangan keras terhadap dirinya dan kepercayaan dirinya sendiri. Hal yang mungkin sering saya anggap remeh dalam hidup. Saya terlalu biasa menomorsekiankan pekerjaan, terlalu mengikuti ‘apa yang sedang saya mau’.
Tapi Frost seakan membukakan mata saya dengan berteriak: Hey, life can’t wait!

Dan dari sosok Richard Nixon dalam film ini, saya menemukan fakta yang membawa saya pada pemikiran: Setiap manusia memiliki hati nurani.
Entah itu tersimpan dimana, tapi Nixon, yang setelah ia dilengserkan dari kursi kepresidenan selalu melakukan pertahanan terhadap kritik yang dilancarkan terhadap dirinya, pada akhirnya mengalahkan egoismenya sendiri dan mengikuti kata hatinya: mengakui kesalahannya.

Politisi manapun pasti akan berpikir 2 atau bahkan ratusan kali untuk urusan mengakui skandal yang melibatkan dirinya dan berpeluang menghancurkan karir politiknya selama-lamanya. Tapi Nixon pada akhirnya memilih jalan yang lain, yang mungkin justru akan membuat beban hidupnya sedikit lebih ringan.

Dan tidak akan saya melewatkan kenyataan yang satu ini: Sosok Richard Nixon adalah perpaduan antara politikus handal dan politikus busuk. Ia mampu membuat lawan bicaranya merasa terintimidasi dan melakukan kesalahan-kesalahan dalam pembicaraannya sendiri, sehingga otomatis ‘kemenangan’ perdebatan antara keduanya berada pada Nixon, si intimidator.

Tapi di lain sisi, gaya bicaranya yang sangat diplomatis, pemikiran-pemikirannya yang sangat memperlihatkan kepandaiannya menjawab, membuat saya menyadari, bahwa ia adalah politikus yang memiliki otak dalam arti sebenarnya.

Sungguh jarang saat ini, melihat dan ‘menemukan’ isi pembicaraan berbobot dari para politisi negeri ini. Menjelang pemilu 2009, yang ramai adalah ‘kampanye’. Entah berapa ratusan ribu bendera partai, poster, pamflet, brosur, dan lain-lainnya yang ‘mewarnai’ sudut jalan? Mereka semua seakan berlomba dalam pertarungan yang dinamakan: Menuju RI-1.
Atau mungkin: Menuju entah-apa lah-itu.

Apa yang sebenarnya dicari oleh para politisi di luar sana? Kemenangan? Sorak sorai? Gegap gempita dari pendukung bayaran? Atau hanya kepuasan batin?

Karena politik sebetulnya bukan soal menang atau kalah, menurut saya. Tapi soal apa yang mampu dihasilkannya kemudian. Apakah rakyat membaik kehidupannya? Apakah perekonomian menjadi lebih bersahabat? Apakah negara menjadi damai?

Hati-hatilah dengan usaha anda untuk menang, wahai para politikus negeri ini. Karena lewat film Frost Nixon, anda dapat menyaksikan sendiri : Betapa jarak antara kedigdayaan dengan kehancuran = begitu dekat.
Siapkah anda semua untuk menjadi pemenang? Tentu.
Tapi siapkah anda semua untuk merasakan kehancuran setelahnya?
*Hening*

30 January 2009

"New face" spreading new bravery!



Profile: Turkey's Recep Tayyip Erdogan

Basics:

Full Name: Recep Tayyip Erduğan, also spelled Erdogan

Born: February 26, 1954

Significance: One of Turkey’s most popular and charismatic leaders, he led the resurgence of Islamic-oriented politics in the Muslim world’s most secular democracy.

Current Status: Prime Minister of Turkey (since March 14, 2003)

Notable Life-Markers: Was mayor of Istanbul, was imprisoned for 10 months on subversion charges related to his pro-Islamic stances, was banned from politics, returned as leader of the Justice and Development Party in 2002.

Early Life:
Erdogan was born on February 26, 1954, in Rize, a small city on Turkey's Black Sea coast, in a poor family. He was one of five children. His father worked for Turkey’s coast guard. When Erdogan was 13, the family moved to Istanbul, hoping for better opportunities. Erdogan went to an Islamic school then studied business management at Istanbul’s Marmara University. While there, he joined the country’s growing political Islamist movement. He played soccer professionally and worked for Istanbul’s transportation authority until he was fired for refusing, on religious grounds, to shave his mustache.

Mayor of Istanbul:
After he was fired, Erdogan entered politics full time. In 1994, partly on the strength of his charisma and oratorical skills, partly on account of the deterioration of social services and the city’s exploding population, Erdogan was elected mayor of Istanbul, Turkey’s largest city. He promised better services and better jobs for the huge influx of rural immigrants into the city. He delivered on most of his promises.

Imprisoned for Subversion:
In 1997, Erdogan said in a speech:
“The mosques are our barracks, the domes are our helmets, the minarets are our swords, and the faithful are our army.”
He was the leader the Islamic-oriented Welfare Party at the time. In January 1998, Turkey’s highest court closed the Welfare Party and banned its members from politics, saying the party sought to undermine Turkey’s secular basis. Weeks later, Erdogan was indicted on subversion charges, including inciting “an army of jihad” and “using democracy to establish an evil order.” A military court sentenced him to 10 months in jail, which he started serving in March 1999.

2002 Parliamentary Victory:
Upon his release from prison, and facing the court’s ban on the activities of the Islamist Virtue Party and Welfare Party, Erdogan helped found the Justice and Development Party, known in Turkey as Adalet ve Kalkinma Partisi, or AK, in August 2001. It was the 281st political party created in Turkey since the first party was set up in 1859. Erdogan was elected its leader. Two months later, the AK swept to power in parliamentary elections with 34.2 percent of the vote, winning 363 of 550 seats.

Prime Minister:
Because of his previous conviction, Erdogan was banned from serving as prime minister or holding any government post. His party’s parliamentary majority quickly changed that by passing a constitutional amendment effectively revoking the ban. Erdogan ran for office in a by-election and became prime minister on March 14, 2003. He replaced Abdullah Gül, who resigned to make room for Erdogan. Gul served as foreign minister until 2007.

Continued Rise of Turkey’s Islamists:
In July 2007, the Islamist Justice and Development Party won 46.6 percent of the popular vote in nationwide parliamentary elections, solidifying Erdogan’s position. Erdogan backed Abdullah Gul’s bid for the presidency, which Gul won on Aug. 28, 2007, becoming Turkey’s 14th president.

Head-Scarf Controversy:
In early 2008, Erdogan led the parliamentary charge to repeal Turkey's ban on wearing the Islamic head scarf on private or public university campuses, in government buildings or in schools. Parliament voted in February 2008 to repeal the ban, handing Erdogan a major victory. But the changes must first be approved by the president and pass constitutional muster through the nation's Constitutional Court, a secular institution.

A More Moderate Erdogan?:
Erdogan has moderated his positions the stronger his party’s hold on Turkish politics has become. Even though he once called the European Union a “Christian club,” he supports Turkey’s bid to join the Union. He supported the Bush administration’s request in 2003 to use Turkey as a staging ground for the invasion of Iraq, but Erdogan and Bush were rebuffed by the Turkish Parliament. Erdogan has overseen the moderation and reform of many Turkeish policies, including, in 2001, the abolition of the death penalty (except in times of war and for acts of terrorism), the abolition of torture in Turkish prisons, and allowing the use of the Kurdish language in broadcasting and education. But Erdogan has maintained a hard line against Kurdish separatists in eastern Turkey and has led the charge to pursue and bomb Kurdish militants in Iraq, or invade northern Iraq if necessary. The European Union is resisting Turkey’s bid to join, saying Turkey’s human rights violations and its uneven economy remain a major concern.


From me: Yes, this is the new face for my political ppint of view.
He was sitting bravely face to face with Israeli's President-Simon Peres, in Davos while they were interviewed by moderator in between The World Economic Forum.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan was out of the conference after the moderator refuse to hear more from Erdogan about his paradigm and opinion of Gaza's war.
Erdogan straightly pointing on Peres face and said:
"You are killing people!"

This is what this world need now. The leader with nothing to afraid of, while he/she wants to make a justice enforcement and clearing the people's mind.
What happened in Gaza's strip for 22 days was a horrible things. Maybe Hamas in this case is not a gently kind of political party where they seems like hiding behind their own problems, but whatever the reasons are, the point is:

"1,300 Palestinians were killed during Israel's 22-day aerial, naval and ground assault on Gaza. Thirteen Israeli citizens died over the same period."-Al Jazeera


Erdogan, i will looking more and more about you.
Because i want to know who you really are.

29 January 2009

Being Indonesian...


I was sitting in my sister's room and currently looking at my laptop to find out my Legal Committee-guide (i was preparing myself to attend The Harvard WorldMUN 2009 in The Hague, this March).
At that same time, i was thinking deeply about:

1. Will i be proud of my nationalist when i'm in The Hague? I meant, when i (finally) be there, what will i do regarding asking the 'where do you come from' question? Will i proudly explain 'them' about my Indonesia?

Yea, now, this morning, i'm thinking about it again and again. It's more that just think "What would i wear during the conferences there". Because it's all about your dignity, Afie! About the country where u was born, the place where u call "HOME".

Am i proud of being an Indonesian?
YES. Totally. For Goodsake.

WHY?
Hmm, maybe it's quite cliche for some of you, but let me tell u the truth here:
If it isn't us, the real Indonesian, so who will? Right now, too many problems facing this country. From uncertainty economic situation, a very low human right enforcement (especially in Munir case), a soon-to-be chaos political ambience, and one thing: Poverty.

Yes, i'm so proud of being an Indonesian, because we have it all here. Although the Dutch ancestors have made our ancestors suffer for 3 decades and half, but right now we are stronger than ever! *at least i trust this point of view*

My biq question ehich pop into my mind this year is: Hey, where are the YOUTH SPIRITS which suppose to be some mass campaign in this country? Where are the 19-25 peoples? Where are they?

The fact is: They're actually here, around me and around you all too. But they dont give even a damn care to 'what this country should do' things, because they've got influenced by the Western lifestyle which consists of: Fashion and all those things.

I DIDN'T SAID THAT: BEING A STYLISH PERSON IS A CRIME, NO!
But can't you stablize it? You can be a stylish person and a very caring person too!
You can get some extra credit for that, you know..
So why dont you start from now?
1.Buy your own Indonesia's products;
2.Do not shame to use and promote Indonesia's cultural product;
3.Say it outloud out there wherever you are: I'M AN INDONESIAN!!

Because if not us, who will then?
=)